Category: Design

Scenario: 夕方のデザイン　White light to Moody Yellow color

LeniSchwendinger_Masterplan http://www.lightprojectsltd.com/projects/design_works_flatbush.php

As ‘Lighting master plan level’
Works as white light for night time. Turns yellow-ish color for friday and weekend nights. And use can arrange colors as he/she wants.

Title

夕方のデザイン： White Light to Moody Yellow Light
Theme 流れにかかわる：
Place —
Time/Occasion —
People —
Interaction/
Participation		 夕焼けを呼ぶ、操作する。
Lighting Street Light, Light up of buildings, etc
  • 丸の内。
  • 金曜の夜に共有通路？の照明を白からアンバーに切り替えてゆく。
  • これは、夕焼けを遅くにするという表現。
  • この切り替えが、家路を急ぐ会社員の流れと、（おそらく逆向きの）店舗エリアへ急ぐ人々の流れに影響されて、三々五々変わってゆく。
  • Productivityのための空間からEntertainment,Relax and Consumptionのための空間に変化する時間の表現と、時間によって機能を変化する場所の効果の最大化を狙う。
    • 夕方のデザイン。
    • 室内の（時間を感じない）場所は対象からはずすー＞駅のおばあちゃんのナビゲーションとかの昼間も含めたユーザビリティ的シナリオはどうするの？
    • 夕方とは
    • 自然の力（日光が消える）に人間が対抗する光をともす時間。光にも造園と一緒で、自然と人工の兼ね合いがこの時間生じる。
    • 壁や屋根で室内と外を仕切る建築にたいして、昼と夜の境目を制御する人工の光。
    • 日光の衰えと、人工の光の登場が交差する。トワイライトゾーン。
    • よって、１日の間で限られた時間である。
    • 闇はみなキャンバスになりうる
    • The Marriage of Necessity and Happiness (Ecological Democracy, p5)
    • ゾーニングへの反抗。一つの場所に２つの使用目的とそのためのムードがあってもいいではないか。プロントの例、金曜夜のオフィス街の光の色のアイ デア。Alternaive ‘zoning’ /beyond square ‘zoning’ ->一粒で２度おいしい。

DJ Light, Cinimod Studio, Lima, Peru. 2010

http://www.cinimodstudio.com/dj-light

DJ Light is an immersive public sound and light installation that gives visitors the power to orchestrate an awe-inspiring performance of light and sound across a large public space. It was created for energy company Endesa as the cornerstone of their Christmas celebrations in Lima, Peru.

DJ Light (DJ Luz), Lima 2010 from Cinimod Studio on Vimeo.

http://www.cinimodstudio.com/
http://www.cinimodstudio.com/

Urban Open Space: Designing For User Needs, Marc Francis, 2003

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1559631139

Product Description

Research has shown that successful public spaces are ones that are responsive to the needs of their users, are democratic in their accessibility, and are meaningful for the larger community and society. While considerable research has been done on needs and conflicts in open space, no one document integrates all this knowledge and makes it available to professionals, students, and researchers.

  • Foreword
  • Urban open space: Case study in land and community design
  • Introduction: Designing for user needs
    • P4
      • Parks, plazas, streets, community gardens, and greenways (Carr et al. 1992; Lynch 1972)
      • The life between buildings(1987;Gehl and Gemoze 1996)
      • Third places(Ray Oldenburg 1989)
    • P6 A Typology of Urban Open Spaces
  • The LAF case study method
  • Urban open spaces: Why some work and others don’t
      • P14 Why Public Spaces Fail
      • P15 Principles of Creating Great Public Spaces
    • The research on urban parks and open space
      • P19 Case Studies of User Needs in Open Space
        • Issue based case studies
        • Place-based case studies
        • Case studies of types of open space
      • User Needs
      • Comfort
      • Relaxation
      • Passive Engagement
      • Active Engagement
      • Discovery
      • Fun
      • User Conflicts
      • Safety / Security
      • Abuse
      • Conflicts Between User Groups
      • Cultural Differences
      • Gender Conflicts
      • Ability
      • Privatization of Public Space
      • Conflicts Between Use and Ecology
  • Design, development, and decision making.
  • Bryant park: a case study of designing of public spaces
  • Community Participation
    • The landscape architect’s role
    • Approaches to maintenance and management
  • Evaluating the needs and limitations of public spaces
    • The literature on user needs in urban open space
    • Critical reviews
      • ..for example, Project for Public Spaces in New York City (2000) states that places should be created, “not just designed”. Three of their ‘Eleven Steps to Transforming Public Spaces into Great Community Places’ emphasize programming over design and the evolving nature of good open spaces.
    • Why design urban spaces?
    • Limitations and problems
    • Principles of public places
    • Design and Management recommendations for public open space
      • source: Project for Public Spaces, How to Turn a Place Around, 2000, p86-93
    • Issues and Research for the Future

  • Conclusions and recommendations
  • Bibliography
  • Websites and Listservs
  • Photo Credits
  • Sources of Information
  • Index
  • About the author

 

 

 

Product Description

Research has shown that successful public spaces are ones that are responsive to the needs of their users, are democratic in their accessibility, and are meaningful for the larger community and society. While considerable research has been done on needs and conflicts in open space, no one document integrates all this knowledge and makes it available to professionals, students, and researchers.

Based on archival research; published case studies; site visits; and interviews with researchers, open space designers, managers, and users, Urban Open Space looks across several seminal studies to glean significant findings and design implications related to user needs and conflicts. It reviews and identifies those critical user needs that must be considered in the planning, design, and management of outdoor spaces, and synthesizes that knowledge into an accessible and useful document.

 

About the Author

Mark Francis, a Fellow of the American Society of Landscape Architects, is professor of landscape architecture at the University of California, Davis, and senior design consultant with MIG in Berkeley and Davis. Trained in landscape architecture and urban design at Berkeley and Harvard, he is author of more than sixty articles and book chapters translated into a dozen languages. His books include Community Open Spaces (Island Press, 1984), The Meaning of Gardens (MIT, 1990), Public Space (Cambridge, 1992), and The California Landscape Garden Ecology, Culture and Design (California, 1999). His work has focused on the use and meaning of the built and natural landscape. Much of this research has utilized a case study approach to study parks, gardens, public spaces, streets, nearby nature, and urban public life.

Public Places Urban Spaces,2nd Ed: The Dimentions of Urban Design, Matthew Caroma,et al, 2010

http://www.amazon.com/Public-Places-Urban-Spaces-Second/dp/1856178277/ref=dp_ob_title_bk

Review

…a thorough and workman-like reference for anyone seeking a deeper understanding of urban design.
Architect’s Journal‘This will become the standard textbook on its subject, and deservedly so.’
Robert Cowan, Director, Urban Design Group, UK. –This text refers to the Kindle Edition edition.

 

Product Description

Public Places Urban Spaces 2e is a thorough introduction to the principles of urban design theory and practice. Authored by experts in the fields of urban design and planning, it is designed specifically for the 2500 postgraduate students on Urban Design courses in the UK, and 1500 students on undergraduate courses in the same subject.The second edition of this tried and trusted textbook has been updated with relevant case studies to show students how principles have been put into practice. The book is now in full colour and a larger format, so students and lecturers get a much stronger visual package and easy to use layout, enabling them to more easily practically apply principles of urban design to their projects.

Sustainability is the driving factor in urban regeneration and new urban development, and the new edition is focused on best sustainable design and practice. Public Places Urban Spaces is a must-have purchase for those on urban design courses and for professionals who want to update and refresh their knowledge.

. Tried and tested textbook in urban design, giving a comprehensive introduction to the principles and theory of urban design
. New and key focus on trends in sustainable design
. Now full colour to better visually demonstrate to students the application of design principles

‘7000 Oaks’ 1982-87, Joseph Beuys

[gview file=”http://research.norifujimura.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/7000Oaks_Timeline.ppt”]

[gview file=”http://research.norifujimura.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/7000Oaks_Timeline.pptx”]

 

7000Oaks_Timeline

7000 Oaks

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7000_Oaks

Joseph Beuys

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Beuys

Social Sculpture

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_sculpture

In 1973, Beuys wrote:

“Only on condition of a radical widening of definitions will it be possible for art and activities related to art [to] provide evidence that art is now the only evolutionary-revolutionary power. Only art is capable of dismantling the repressive effects of a senile social system that continues to totter along the deathline: to dismantle in order to build ‘A SOCIAL ORGANISM AS A WORK OF ART’… EVERY HUMAN BEING IS AN ARTIST who – from his state of freedom – the position of freedom that he experiences at first-hand – learns to determine the other positions of the TOTAL ART WORK OF THE FUTURE SOCIAL ORDER.” [1]

*^ Beuys statement dated 1973, first published in English in Caroline Tisdall: Art into Society, Society into Art (ICA, London, 1974), p.48. Capitals in original.

AirSketcher: 風を使いやすくする手法の提案とその実装, 渡邊恵太,2011

http://www.persistent.org/airsketcher.html

現代の空調システムには，温度設定が部屋単位であることや人間の室温の感じ方の差など課題がある．本研究では，その解決手法としてインタラクションの観点から使いやすい風をつくりだすAirSketcherを提案する．AirSketcherは直接的で多様な風を容易につくりだすことができる扇風機（送風）システムである．扇風機にインタラクティブ性を持たせ，ユーザが意図通り風を操作可能になることで，空調に対する不満を解決できるのではないかと考えた．本研究では風を制御するインタラクション手法として風を操るかのようなメタファで風を制御するAirWand, 風を描くメタファを用いて風を制御するAirCanvas, 風を受け入れるか否かをカードによって指示するAirFlagをの3つを考案し試作した．