Category: Thesis

Thesis Statement Draft, as of April 9th, 2011

Thesis Statement Draft,  as of April 9th, 2011

The urban media lighting is a medium consists of physical devices such as LED light, mobile phone and networked sensors combined with mobilephone network to connect users. This combination of hardware, software and service should be a part of public service. (What)

It supports social stability to resolve a weakness of urban spaces built based on modern urban planning theory: lack of attention to keep, maintain and forge social ties of its users. We can find different types of urban space where social ties between its inhabitants are in danger. (Why)

This is for the place where different type of people come across in daily basis such as Station, Shopping mall, Park, etc in emerging city areas such as suburban new-town or boundary where new city is about to concur old city. (Where)

The users of those places are not aware of each other’s existence because they just moved in or in a situation like groups of people with different demographics are juxtaposed without proper contact points and occasions. Or improper urban planning even weaken existing ties and make familiar people unfamiliar.(Who)

The urban media lighting system provides shared experiences between them with a combination of physical device and network service situated on site. It gives interaction between members of user in two ways. specially when wants and desires of them cross and conflicts at the site. The system embraces the conflict, and give the users to (How)

When needs of different user conflicts, interaction (needs more detail. What circumstances and /or situation->what) happens.When social ties are weaken, the (When)

  • Why: Social Capital is a buzz word
  • Where: You’ll need at least 3 examples and (an) elaboration
  • Who:　誰？姿が見えない。記述が浅いから
  • Why:　どのような問題が起こっているのか
  • How:　どのように救われるのか
  • How:　どんなインタラクションが起こるのか？
  • 言い換えが浅い

Post industrial city, where major economic change threaten existing community and needs of rebuilding of community arise.

 

•Where strangers are come and go becomes place to get to know and share time in lives.
•Hence make social capital of the area up.
• It will support formation of Social Capital, which normally handled by non-artifact ways. On crossing points, those who are living different area come across. Media….will make negative mood of such a place to positive..
•Hence the system will increase
•Urban media lighting should be a part of public service which government should provide (add to ‘what’)
•プロポーザルでは結論がでそうなフレームが示せればよい。Thesisが価値を示せること。
•1)crossing points where these users periodically come across.

Scenario: ‘At a town’

Scenario: ‘At a town’

広場：その地区のメンバーに表現の場を与える開かれた光

ビル：ビルのある風景を共有している人々からの建物への逆アクセス

familiar stranger:携帯電話やデバイスの中に閉じないサービスデザイン。第三者に隠さないデザインとしての光

Social Media Lighting

Scenario: Run

  • ランニングはどのようなコミュニティか
    • community of practice
    • 朝と夜に集中
  • 似ているものは？
    • 自転車（東京臨海部）
    • 犬の散歩
  • Five Ws one H
    Who is about?
    What Happened?
    Where did it take place?
    • 皇居
      • 信号がないので、停止しなくてよい
    • 目黒川
    • そんるん（ソウル）
    When did it take place?
    • 朝と夜に集中
    Why did it happen?
    How did it happen?
  • ランニングに関わる問題
  • ランニングとビジネス
    • 皇居周辺のランナーサポートビジネス
      • 銭湯
      • スポーツメーカー各社
    • Nike+ Run
    • Adidus
    • ランネット（マラソン大会参加者用SNS)

nile run+を参考。走っていると、拍手のかわりに近く（前方）の照明がまたたく。

自分の前方の明かりから明るくなってゆくー＞他のランナーの気配もわかるー＞すれ違い時にお互いの関係性もわかる（光の色などで）

その場所にいるメンバー同士の関係を示す光の色。

広場：その地区のメンバーに表現の場を与える開かれた光

ビル：ビルのある風景を共有している人々からの建物への逆アクセス

Scenario: Suica/Station. Message for working mom.

Scenario: March 11th,2011

えき.suicaで個人を特定.子供が親にお帰りなさいの光を贈る.
改札か.改札のそとか.ホームか
混雑しているときにはアクティベイトされない.
ここでは切り離れているのは親子

スイカで支払うときの音,ledの色をカスタマイズできる

Run の話も.同じルートの前後を走っている同類の気配を知るものといえる.

Thesis Statement Draft, March 8th, 2011

Thesis Statement Draft,  as of March 8th, 2011

The urban media lighting is a medium consists of physical devices such as LED light, mobile phone and networked sensors combined with mobilephone network to connect users. This combination of hardware, software and service should be a part of public service. (What)It supports social stability to resolve a weakness of modern urban planning theory: lack of attention to keep, maintain and forge social ties of its users. (Why) For the place where different type of people come across in daily basis such as Station, Shopping mall, Park, etc in emerging city areas such as suburban new-town or boundary where new city is about to concur old city. (Where) the users of those places are not aware of each other’s existence because they just moved in or in a situation like groups of people with different demographics are juxtaposed without proper contact points and occasions. Or improper urban planning even weaken existing ties and make familiar people unfamiliar.(Who) The urban media lighting system provides shared experiences between them with a combination of physical device and network service situated on site. It gives interaction between members of user. (How) When needs of different user conflicts, interaction (needs more detail. What circumstances and /or situation->what) happens.When social ties are weaken, the (When)

  • Why: Social Capital is a buzz word
  • Where: You’ll need at least 3 examples and (an) elaboration
  • Who:　誰？姿が見えない。記述が浅いから
  • Why:　どのような問題が起こっているのか
  • How:　どのように救われるのか
  • How:　どんなインタラクションが起こるのか？
  • 言い換えが浅い

Post industrial city, where major economic change threaten existing community and needs of rebuilding of community arise.

 

•Where strangers are come and go becomes place to get to know and share time in lives.
•Hence make social capital of the area up.
• It will support formation of Social Capital, which normally handled by non-artifact ways. On crossing points, those who are living different area come across. Media….will make negative mood of such a place to positive..
•Hence the system will increase
•Urban media lighting should be a part of public service which government should provide (add to ‘what’)
•プロポーザルでは結論がでそうなフレームが示せればよい。Thesisが価値を示せること。
•1)crossing points where these users periodically come across.

Scenario: Moon city, Seoul. Apeal the town to the people around.

Scenario: Feb25th2011-2

月の街

月の街の住民たちが、自分たちで自分たちの丘の光らせ方を操作できる。観客は裕福なマンション住まいの周辺地域の人々、高速道路を走る車の運転者など、交通や視線を通じてソウルの広い地域にまたがって存在する。

Scenario: A deserted house as message medium.

Scenario: Feb25th2011-1

開放された風景の価値。

廃屋を媒体に、ある人からある人への光のメッセージが届けられる。廃屋が忌むものとして存在する地域へ、それを再生の契機とできないかという提案。

The Creative City , Refurbishment of industrial buildings

Thesis Statement Draft: Feb 21st, 2011

Thesis Statement Draft as of Feb 21st,2011

•I‘d like to make an artifact: urban media lighting, a combination of physical devices such as LED light, Mobile phone and Networked sensors with mobilephone network. (What) The urban media lightingsupports social stability to resolve a problem on modern urban planning theory: lack of attention (of something..) to social capital. (Why) For the place where different type of people come across such as Station, Shopping mall, etc (Where)  the users of those places are not aware of each other’s existence. (Who)  The urban media lighting system provides shared experiences between them with a combination of physical device and network service situated on site. It gives interaction between members of user. (How) When needs of different user conflicts, interaction (needs more detail. What circumstances and /or situation->what) happens. (When)
  • What: Social Capital is a buzz word
  • What: ‘Artifact: is a weak noun.
  • Where: You’ll need at least 3 examples and (an) elaboration
  • Who:　誰？姿が見えない。記述が浅いから
  • How:　どんなインタラクションが起こるのか？
  • 言い換えが浅い
• It will support formation of Social Capital, which normally handled by non-artifact ways. On crossing points, those who are living different area come across. Media….will make negative mood of such a place to positive..
•Urban media lighting should be a part of public service which government should provide (add to ‘what’)
•(1パラグラフにして、博士メーリングリストにながすのが、宿題）
•プロポーザルでは結論がでそうなフレームが示せればよい。Thesisが価値を示せること。

Okude PhD Seminar, Feb11th 2011 ‘Literature Review’


Okude PhD Seminar, Feb11th 2011 ‘Literature Review’

Literature Review<ppt file

先週の復習

*Thesis statement

You have to make an open thesis/argument  to provoke/atimulate others

Read, make relationship between data and make insight,

Then write Working thesis

Relationship between evidences

You have to take an position

*Thesis Evaluation and questioning

Did I answer the questioin?

Elaboration : how it is logical?

Why it is important?

 

今週

Literature reviews

We also need short literature review… but it is not needed for the proposal

You can define what information you need for the thesis.

Summary=Praphrase

if you show 25 thesis,,, you have to integrate it for your hypothesis

Purpose: to make a new argument.

you have to show a handy guide for your thesis…your own overview of your research.

leterature review will be a very good backbone of your research

*

Clarification

narrow your topic

Consider whether your sources are current or not.

Strategy for writing a good review

Find a focus

Organizing body

1)Chronological

2)by publication

3)by thematic

4)by methodological

questins for further research

begin composing

use evidence

use quotes sparingly

summarise and synthesize

Number the paragraphs and paraphrase it with no criticize

＊

QandA

チャレンジポイントを定めてそこに向かってゆく。２、３年でそこを証明できるか。

Literature reviewもまた、field workなんです

いろんな人がそのトピックに関していろいろ論じているのをみて、私はこう論じるのだと。

google scholar

web of science

論文ひとつひとsつではなくて、複数論文の関係が重要。

じん、ときたものに対してはクリティカルリーディングをかける。

thesis statementをつくらないで本をよんでゆくのは間違い。

Thesis satement　と　Literature Reviewの作り方がこれからのセミナーの骨格。

Thesis argument for thesis statement and perspective argument for literature review

＊

Lee

Thesis statementのsubjectは？

>Model

verb?

>Design, Knowledge and Organization

 

a modelにフォーカスしているのだから、文章はa modelで皆おわらなくてはいけない。そうできないようになってきたら、そもそもa modelをかえる。

実際のdissertationには、プロポーザルとは違って、thesis statementはかかない。

without logical argument, it can not unfold

FOCALISATION: keep focus on ‘ model’. if you like to talk about knowledge, relate ‘knowledge’ to the ‘model’

Why:なぜこれだと勝てるのか。

書いたものはすべてつかえるのだからキープする。無いのは論理的構造だから、それを作る。それにはfocalizationが必要。

基本：WhyとHowにこたえられないかぎりWhatをかえ続けなければならない。

＊

Kawasaki

Thesis statementに対してどのようにロジックがたてられているかが問題であっって、オリジナリティ、contributionは、literature reviewで語られるもののはずであるy。

サービスだから複数の人達のため。。

＊

最初にシンプルな論理構造を作る。これをなるべくはやめに発見する。

つくるものがわかっていて、そのバックグラウンドをもっているなら、プロトタイプはプロポーザル後でもよい。

＊

reviewでは、一番気に入ったarticle reviewをつくるべし

自分に向いた記事にいれこんでゆく。

なんとかreviewというのは、論文のレビューです。

＊

李、小林、藤村はなるべくはやく、はずかしくないThesis statementをここで発表するべし。

うりうさんといあんは、自分の使っている文献整理ツールについての発表をしてください。